Contract grading is an assessment method that emphasizes collaboration between students and instructors to establish clear, transparent criteria for course outcomes and grades. This approach involves creating a formal agreement (or contract) at the beginning of the course that specifies the tasks, level of work, and behaviors a student must complete to achieve a particular grade. Contracts often delineate expectations for different grade levels, allowing students to choose a path that aligns with their goals and commitments outside of the classroom.
This method fosters student autonomy, accountability, and personalization of the learning experience, as students can make informed decisions about their workload and educational objectives. Moreover, contract grading can reduce anxiety and competition among students by clarifying expectations and minimizing subjective evaluations. It shifts the focus from earning grades to learning and mastering content, promoting a more intrinsic motivation toward education. While implementing contract grading requires upfront effort in terms of communication and agreement on expectations, it ultimately leads to a more student-centered learning environment that supports diverse learning styles and paces.
Implementing contract grading in a course requires thoughtful planning and a clear communication strategy to ensure that both instructors and students understand the system and its benefits. Here are several steps and strategies faculty members can use to begin integrating contract grading into their teaching:
What is Contract Grading? - University of Nebraska-Lincoln Center for Transformative Teaching
Contract grading is a type of standards-based grading that incorporates the use of a contract between the student and the instructor on what must be completed and to what level of mastery to earn a specific grade in the course.This resource outlines the benefits and challenges of this approach along with instructions and examples.
A Student Perspective on Contract Grading - Insight: A Journal of Scholarly Writing
Contract grading offers a safe and unique learning opportunity for students who otherwise, like me, get caught up in the intricacies of rubric requirements and possible teacher biases. I learned to stop thinking about my writing in terms of what my professor would want to read, and instead I began writing what I wanted to write.
Labor-Based Grading Contracts: Building Equity and Inclusion in the Compassionate Writing Classroom - Asao B. Inoue
In the second edition of Labor-Based Grading Contracts, Asao B. Inoue refines his exploration of labor-based grading contracts in the writing classroom. Drawing on antiracist teaching practices, he argues that labor-based grading contracts offer a compassionate approach that is strongly grounded in social justice work. Updated with a new foreword and revised chapters, the book offers a meditation on how Inoue’s use of Freirean problem-posing led him to experiment with grading contracts. The result is a robust Marxian theory of labor that considers Hannah Arendt’s theory of labor-work-action and Barbara Adam’s concept of “timescapes.” The heart of the book details the theoretical and practical ways labor-based grading contracts can be used and assessed for effectiveness in classrooms and programs. Inoue concludes his exploration of labor-based grading by moving outside the classroom, considering how assessing writing in the socially just ways he offers in the book may provide a way to address the violence and discord seen in the world today.